fbpx

Out, Up, and Through

The following is a page from The Fault Tolerant Forehand, available in eBook and paperback formats on Amazon (click here).

Every player has been coached to “brush up the back of the ball” in order to generate topspin. While this advice is technically correct, it’s very misleading as to how this famous “brushing” actually happens. Most players understand that they need to swing up and through the ball, but what many haven’t been taught is that it’s also essential to swing out to the ball. There are three critical vectors to the correct swing path, not two.

Out, up, and through.

Of these three directions, the out part is the most overlooked. Despite it’s lack of popularity though, it is essential to generating a heavy, fast forehand, and it’s actually far more important than the up direction. Only a swing containing the out vector imparts forces on the racket that cause it to naturally rotate around the wrist through the hitting zone.

This racket rotation is the less understood, but more important of the two fundamental movement patterns that are used to generate topspin in tennis.

The Two Topspin Movement Patterns

The two movement patterns that generate topspin in tennis are very different in their execution. The first – the well known one – is upward translation of the racket-arm system through contact. As the player hits, if the racket-arm system is moving up, then, at impact, friction with the back of the ball will generate torque on it and create topspin ball rotation. This is the “swing low to high” idea which we’ve all heard countless times.

You’ll often see tour level players hit heavy topspin shots while barely even using an upward translational component in their swing .

However, the other movement pattern that generates topspin is far more important, especially at the highest level – racket rotation about the forearm. Through the hitting zone, the racket whips around the wrist, about the axis of the forearm. This rotational whip constitutes the traditionally named “windshield wiper” motion, and it also creates an upward frictional force on the back of the ball at contact.

Whether or not the entire arm-racket system is translating up, when the racket is rotating about the forearm during contact, the racket itself is still explosively moving upward through the strike (even if the arm is not). And this upward racket motion, the motion generated by racket rotation, is responsible for a lot more of the total upward frictional force imparted at contact than any upward translational motion is.

Topspin on the Tour – Primarily Racket Rotation

You’ll often see tour level players hit heavy topspin shots while barely even using an upward translational component in their swing – their follow-through ends up below their non-hitting shoulder. How is that possible? Heavy topspin without the racket-arm system moving drastically up through contact? How did they generate all that spin without swinging “low to high?” It works because they’ve generated almost 100% of their spin using the racket rotation contributor, rather than by translating the racket up.

Dominic Thiem hitting a waist height, cross court forehand by swinging out to the ball, and allowing his racket to whip over and finish below his shoulder.
Dominic Theim striking a waist height cross-court with heavy spin, despite finishing his swing below his non-hitting shoulder; his spin and racket head speed are generated almost entirely by racket rotation through the hitting zone.

Additionally, the heaviest spin players, players like Dominic Thiem and Rafael Nadal, will often use both movement patterns together – they both swing the entire racket-arm system up, and they relax, swing out, and allow the racket to whip about their forearm. The result is that they finish these shots above their head, and by utilizing both topspin generating techniques together, they generate some of the highest RPM forehands on the tour.

Rafael Nadal utilizing both racket rotation and upward translation to generate maximum spin on a knee height forehand from the baseline.
Rafael Nadal utilizing both racket rotation and upward translation to generate maximum spin on a knee height forehand from the baseline.

Elite players also utilize the same biomechanics on every forehand, regardless of contact point. Racket rotation can be easy to lose, especially on low balls, if adjustment to low contact is performed incorrectly. Instead of adjusting their contact height using their arm – pulling it closer to their body to get the racket lower – elite players adjust by sitting down lower and tilting their torso. This way, the arm can flick out and around the body in the same motion relative to the trunk at every contact height, even a low contact. And thus, elite players do not lose the anatomical advantage of racket rotation when contact needs to me made lower than usual.

The Role of the Out Vector

So what does out have to do with any of this?

The out vector is the result of the volitional action by which we generate this racket rotation, the most important contributor to topspin. By consciously swinging out to the ball and contacting it laterally away from the body, we generate the force that causes the racket to naturally whip around the wrist.

As we begin our hip rotation and swing the racket out to the ball, the racket naturally lags behind our relaxed wrist. Then, as the racket gets to the end of its outward trajectory, the hand naturally pulls on it, causing it to whip around.

Federer's wrist lag leads into racket rotation as the racket flips around at the end of it's range of motion.
Roger Federer’s relaxed wrist lags behind his hand as it is swung out to the ball. Then, as the racket hits the edge of its range of motion and can no longer continue out, it rotates around the forearm and is thereby explosively moving both up and forward through contact.

It’s like the racket is connected to the end of a string, and when the string goes taught, when our arm is finished extending, then the racket’s path continues around whatever trajectory it was started on before it hit the end of that range of motion – in this case, that inertia causes the racket to rotate about the athlete’s forearm.

This is not the case if the racket is flung to a contact point that is laterally closer to the body; in that case, there’s no outward force on the racket during the swing, and so the resulting racket motion as the racket hits the end of its range of motion is just back-to-front, no rotation. This pure, translational, back-to-front swing was common in the past in tennis, but it’s a swing that can’t generate anywhere near the level of racket head speed and topspin that the modern swing can.

Conscious Effort vs Automatic Results

As tennis instructors, it’s important that we make it abundantly clear which movements during a swing are volitional, and which ones are automatic. Racket rotation about the forearm through the hitting zone is automatic – it is NOT created via conscious effort, and the wrist and hand musculature do not play ANY role in generating this rotational force (though they do stabilize the racket and string angle while that rotation is happening).

This is an extremely common misconception – many coaches harmfully instruct their students to “use your wrist,” despite the fact that the wrist’s job is just to relax and to allow forces generated by other parts of the body to act on the racket and whip it around that relaxed wrist. Wrist lag, racket rotation, and essentially the racket’s entire swing path after the volitional initiation of the forward swing constitute dynamic positions; they are entered automatically as a result of other intentional actions taken before them.

Confusion Surrounding “Wrist Action”

When tennis commentators talk about “great wrist action,” what they really mean is that the player does a great job of relaxing their wrist and allowing their wrist to act as a hinge transferring force into the ball, not that the wrist is in any way generating the force itself.

Kyrgios hitting a high forehand, utilizing good "wrist action"
When Nick Kyrgios jumps off the court and slaps a 100mph forehand winner, the commentators often compliment his “live wrist.” What they are really complimenting is how relaxed it is, and how efficiently it transfers the power from his core into the ball.

And when they talk about a player having a “strong wrist,” that’s simply a reference to the fact that the harder a player swings, the stronger their wrist must be to stabilize the racket during that swing. It is NOT implying that the player’s “strong wrist” is creating that racket head speed by using its strength.

The action that actually generates the racket head speed is the trunk rotation which flings the racket out and through the ball. Therefore, the action that a tennis player should think about while playing is just that – swing out to the ball and strike it away from the body.

That’s it.

Do that with a relaxed wrist, and as your racket gets to the end of it’s range of motion, it will naturally and automatically rotate. Any conscious attempt at using the wrist or the arm to create the windshield wiper motion will typically just lead to harmful wrist tension, ineffective shots, and injury.

So How Do I Actually Apply This?

The physics at play during the windshield wiper motion are pretty complex, so ignore the physics themselves when you’re on the court (but understand them off the court). Instead, just remember the cause and effect:

Cause – swinging out to the ball with a relaxed wrist

Effect – the racket will whip around the wrist and rotate through the contact zone

We use this knowledge to debug our own forehand. If you feel like, one day, you aren’t getting sufficient topspin on your shot, a failure to properly swing out to the ball may be the culprit.

We’ve all had the experience where, certain days, our stroke feels great, but then, other days, all of its fault tolerance has evaporated and it’s a struggle to even get it in the court. Perhaps you’ve accidentally started violating the fundamental theorem of tennis. Perhaps you’re fatigued (or just being lazy), and you aren’t playing low and wide enough. Or perhaps you’ve subconsciously altered your contact point, pulling it in towards the body, thereby preventing that dynamic, rotational racket flick which generates so much spin.

Remembering to swing out, up, and through the ball, instead of just up and through it, is one more tool in your toolbox for fighting that inconsistency, and consistently maintaining that heavy, fast, fault tolerant forehand that makes tennis so fun to play.

10 Comments

  1. Hajdú Sándor
    February 24, 2021

    Szuper!

    Reply
    1. Johnny (FTF)
      February 24, 2021

      Thanks!

      Reply
  2. Poida
    July 22, 2021

    A great acronym on locking in and 🧠 remembering how to swing:

    Always swing OUT at the ball🎾

    Out, Up and Through 💡

    Reply
  3. Bert
    October 29, 2022

    I get the swinging outward to hit the forehand with the most topspin and speed. My problem is that 90% of the time in setting up to hit the shot, I get too close to the ball, thus I can’t swing outward.

    How do I remedy this?

    Reply
    1. Johnny (FTF)
      October 30, 2022

      Great question.

      Swing without the ball, and figure out where your racket is flying through the air fastest. That’s the spot you want the ball when you strike it. To get an idea of what it looks like, swing, but pause at that spot.

      Setting up properly is a visual task. You need to learn what it looks like when the ball is where you need it to be, and how to move to that spot as you’re tracking the ball while it comes in.

      Another drill is to set up something stationary that you’re going to pretend is the ball – say, a tripod with nothing on top, or something. Move to it, and do your full forehand preparation, but don’t swing. Are you in the right spot? Now, try your swing in slow motion – see if you can extend through, of if you’re too close, and you’re jammed.

      Move the item you’re pretending is the ball around to different locations and see if you can get to the point where you’re getting your preparation distance accurate almost every time.

      Reply
      1. Bert
        November 1, 2022

        Thanks for the answer. I will give it a try. I have also found if I hit off the back foot, I don’t tend to get jammed even if I too close to the ball.

        Reply
        1. Johnny (FTF)
          November 2, 2022

          Awesome! If you’re seeing the ball well off the bounce and at contact, you’ll often be able to adjust your balance last minute and hit a good shot, even if the ball isn’t in the perfect location. Great to hear you’ve got that going.

          Reply
          1. Bert
            November 2, 2022

            Well, I did read the article on eye dominance and my right eye is my dominant eye by far.
            Another quick question if you don’t mind. If you are swinging OUT, UP and THROUGH and your hips and shoulder initiate the wrist lag and swing by rotating left, are your hips and shoulders rotating left while the racket is swinging out toward the right?

    2. Raaj
      August 22, 2023

      @Bert,
      I had the same problem. In addition to my shots being crooked and below optimal, I developed severe tendonitis (Tennis Elbow).

      So here is what I did. Relax and unlearn hitting the ball late. You probably heard it before … but how to hit the ball early 🤷‍♂️🤷‍♂️🤷‍♂️.

      This approach worked for me. You take the non-dominant shoulder (left shoulder in case of righty) and push it front towards the ball with an optional non dominant leg Knee bend (if possible, as it is more effective in closed/neutral stance vs Opens stance). You should feel the tension built up at this position.
      Now I use this momentum to reach the ball in front of me.

      Word of caution: Initially use it with balls that is approaching you with lesser RPM and more timing to setup. Over a period of time once enough muscle memory is built it can be hit at any incoming speed and RPM (Spin)

      Reply
  4. Nelson
    August 28, 2023

    The player is supposed to hit with a slightly closed racket face, and up, out and through. All of that to generate topspin. And this is to be accomplished with a relative fixed arm-truck system , which prevents a bigger “up” vector, and without consciously adjusting the racket face angle.
    My question is: how to avoid netting all the balls? My conclusion (by experience) would be to use the legs to get the “up” vector without tampering the arm-truck system.
    Does it make sense?

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *